……………………
this is options that is hidden via CSS
RE: https://sweet.succubi.services/objects/92b5c1a7-2711-44e0-9e4d-ae495cc60f09
so i am realising that all of these are hidden because the userType is locked to “User” and not “Admin”
@twinkle consumer routers are secured against the end user and left wide open for the isp. this is why our first task with a new isp is to yeet their gear and stand up our own
@twinkle ah yeah thats caused by a lack of "hairpin NAT", the port forwardings only apply from outside of the network.
@twinkle if your router doesnt do it youre basically hosed. we have to make it work in our network with an elaborate ruleset that performs the required inside translations
@twinkle yeah when we were using CenturyLink we had to reverse-engineer the router firmware in order to read the config lol
@twinkle nothing cool about it, we downloaded the firmware and ghidra and started clicking around. they were shelling out to openssl
@atax1a wait
??? the US version of the firmware just has a source code download as per GPL
Please note: The products of TP-Link partly contain software code developed by third parties, including software code subject to the GNU General Public Licence (“GPL“), Version 1/Version 2/Version 3 or GNU Lesser General Public License (“LGPL”). You may use the respective software condition to following the GPL licence terms.
since fucking when did companies respect GPL lmao
did TP-Link get sued or smth
@twinkle oh yeah some router companies comply with the letter of the law there lol. but the interface stuff and encrypted config shit is likely all buried in some proprietary binary that theyve replaced the entire userspace with.
@twinkle that netmask creeps us out, should be closer to 255.255.255.255 >.>
@twinkle yeah that netmask of 255.0.0.0 says to forward all traffic for any address starting with 79. to your router. which. it might work by coincidence, but also is creepy.